Introduction

Robert Morris is considered one of the most prominent Founding Fathers of the United States of America, and his contributions to the American Revolution and the establishment of American democracy are numerous. Morris was a successful businessman and politician, who served as the Superintendent of Finance for the Continental Congress during the Revolution. His work was instrumental in providing financing for the Patriots during the war and was vital to the ultimate success of the American Revolution. Additionally, Robert Morris was a key contributor to the establishment of the United States as a nation, with his participation in the Constitutional Convention and his role as a member of the United States Senate.

Early Life and Family

Robert Morris was born on January 31, 1734, in Liverpool, England. His father was a tobacco merchant, and his family was considered to be part of the middle class. Morris was educated at a private school in England before moving to the United States in his teens to work for a shipping company in Maryland. After working for several years, Morris moved to Philadelphia and began working for a series of merchants, eventually becoming a successful businessman in his own right.

Morris married Mary White, the daughter of a prominent physician, in 1769. The couple had five children together, two sons, and three daughters. Morris was known to be a devoted family man and provided a comfortable life for his family with his successful business ventures.

Role in the American Revolution

Morris played a vital role in the American Revolution and is considered to be one of the most important figures in the financing of the war effort. He participated in the Continental Congress from 1775 to 1778 and acted as the Congress’s Superintendent of Finance from 1781 to 1784. He was responsible for raising funds to support the war effort, and he used his personal credit and connections to borrow money from European banks and wealthy individuals.

Morris was often credited with preventing a financial collapse of the Continental Army by using his personal funds to support the war effort. His financial contributions to the Revolution were invaluable, and without his efforts, the war may have ended differently. Morris was also a signatory to the Declaration of Independence, and his dedication to American liberty is evident throughout his work during the Revolution.

Constitutional Convention and United States Senate

After the American Revolution ended, Morris continued to play a vital role in the establishment of the United States as a nation. He participated in the Constitutional Convention in 1787, representing Pennsylvania, and he was a significant contributor to the development of the United States Constitution. Morris kept a daily journal during the Convention, which detailed the discussions and debates surrounding the creation of the new government, and it is considered an essential historical document.

After the ratification of the United States Constitution, Morris was appointed as one of Pennsylvania’s two members to the United States Senate. His work in the Senate helped to establish many of the financial and economic policies that would guide the newly formed government, and his experience as the Superintendent of Finance during the Revolution made him particularly well-suited to lead these efforts.

Final Years and Legacy

Morris’s final years were marked by financial difficulties, which led him to spend time in debtors’ prisons. He eventually retired from public life and passed away on May 8, 1806.

Despite the struggles he faced later in life, Robert Morris’s contributions to America and the cause of liberty cannot be overstated. His role in financing the American Revolution is considered essential to the country’s success and his work in the Constitutional Convention and the United States Senate helped to establish the foundation for American democracy. Morris was a dedicated public servant and a visionary leader who worked tirelessly to establish a country that would be governed by the people, for the people.

Conclusion

Robert Morris was a successful businessman, a financial expert, and a dedicated public servant who played a vital role in the establishment of the United States of America. As the Superintendent of Finance for the Continental Congress, Morris helped to finance the American Revolution, and his contributions were essential to the ultimate success of the Patriots. He also played a significant role in the creation of the United States Constitution and helped to establish many of the policies and institutions that would guide the new government.

Morris’s legacy as a patriot, statesman, and visionary leader is still felt today, and his contributions to American democracy continue to be recognized and celebrated. His work helped to establish a country founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, and justice for all, and his dedication to these ideals will be remembered for generations to come.

Founding Father: Robert Morris

Robert Morris was born in Liverpool, England on January 20, 1734. When he was 13 years of age, he moved to Maryland to live with his father, a tobacco exporter in Oxford, Maryland.

After a little bit of schooling in Philadelphia, Robert Morris started working at Thomas and Charles Willing’s shipping-banking firm. In 1754, Robert became a partner after the death of Charles. For almost 40, years, Morris was a directory of the firm as well as an important Philadelphia citizen. At the age of 35, Robert Morris married Mary White, with whom he had five sons and two daughters.

During the Stamp Act was being considered by the British Parliament in 1765, Robert Morris joined other merchants to protest the act. However, he only really committed himself to the Revolution after more fighting started almost a decade later. In 1775, he set up a contract with Continental Congress to bring arms and ammunition into the country.

He was also elected to be the Pennsylvania council of safety between 1775 and 1776, the provincial assembly between 1775 and 1776, the legislature between 1776 and 1778, and the Continental Congress from 1775 to 1778. In the Continental Congress, Robert Morris voted against independence for the colonies on July 1, 1776. He thought it was too early for the colonies to be independent. However, the next day he did not vote on purpose in order to help by his approval.

As an important congressman, Robert Morris dealt with military and finance-related issues. Although he had made a lot of money from his firm, he may have had to quit if he did not have any contracts with the Continental Army. Morris worked very closely with General George Washington, borrowed supplies and money from the states, managed to borrowed money even when there was very little, and even took out personal loans to help the Revolutionary War.

After his time in Congress, Robert Morris stayed in the Pennsylvania legislature for two more terms. During this time, many others attacked him because they thought he was profiting in Congress. Even though he was not, it still hurt his reputation.

Robert Morris began the dramatic part of his career when he accepted the position of Superintendent of Finance from 1781 to 1784, which was under the Articles of Confederation. Morris cut all military and government expenditures, purchased army and navy supplies with his own money, kept a close eye on accounting, and sometimes used his personal credit to help. Later, he was re-elected for a term in the Pennsylvania legislature between 1785 and 1786. In 1789, he declined President Washington’s offer to be the first Secretary of the Treasury. Instead, he took a seat in the U.S. Senate for one term from 1789 to 1795.

In the later years of his life, was not very responsible with his money, and found himself being chased by creditors. He tried to hide by going to his estate called “The Hills,” but he turned himself soon after. He went to debtor’s prison until 1801 when he was released. Unfortunately by then, his money and property were gone, he was sick, and his spirit was broken. He lived in a small Philadelphia home on money that was given to his wife by Gouverneur Morris. Robert Morris passed away on May 8, 1806, at the age of 73.

Fun Facts about Robert Morris

•Robert Morris was born on January 20, making him a Capricorn.

•Robert Morris used his own up to create the Bank of North America, which was the very first government-incorporated bank in the country.

•He owned slaves that worked as servants in his home.

•His nickname is the “Financier of the Revolution”.

Introduction

The Arizona v Gant case was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that had a significant impact on the Fourth Amendment and the power of law enforcement to conduct searches of vehicles incident to arrest. The case involved the question of whether police officers may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest even if the arrestee is not within reaching distance of the vehicle at the time of the search. The Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v Gant established a new standard for such searches of vehicles and clarified the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Background

In April 2005, Rodney Gant was arrested in Tucson, Arizona, by police officers who suspected him of driving on a suspended license. Gant was handcuffed and placed in the back of a police car. One of the officers then searched Gant’s car, which was parked nearby, and found a bag of cocaine and drug paraphernalia.

Gant was charged with drug-related offenses, but he challenged the search of his car as a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case to determine whether the search of Gant’s vehicle was constitutional.

The Court’s Decision

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that police officers may only conduct a search of a vehicle incident to an arrest when it is reasonable to believe the arrestee could access the vehicle at the time of the search or that the vehicle contains evidence of the crime that led to the arrest.

The Court reasoned that when an arrestee is in custody and removed from the scene, there is no longer a risk that the arrestee could access the vehicle to retrieve a weapon or evidence. The Court also emphasized that searches incident to arrest must be based on the circumstances of each case, and that a generalized concern for officer safety or the police’s duty to investigate a crime is not enough to justify a search.

Impact and Legacy

The decision in Arizona v Gant had a significant impact on the power of law enforcement to conduct searches incident to arrest. The decision clarified the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and set a new standard for such searches of vehicles.

The decision was also significant in emphasizing the importance of individualized judgments in determining the scope of searches incident to arrest. The Court’s decision in Arizona v Gant required officers to consider the specific circumstances of each case in determining whether a search of a vehicle incident to arrest is constitutional.

Conclusion

Arizona v Gant was a landmark case that established a new standard for searches incident to arrest and clarified the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The decision had significant implications for the power of law enforcement and emphasized the importance of individualized judgments in determining the constitutionality of searches. The decision remains an important part of American legal history and continues to shape the interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment in criminal cases.

Background: Arizona v. Gant

The case of Arizona v. Gant concerns a man named Rodney Joseph Gant. This man was arrested because he was driving with a suspended driver’s license.

After Mr. Gant was taken by the police, the officers conducted a search on his vehicle where they discovered guns and illegal drugs. Because of this search, Mr. Gant was not only charged with illegal operation of a motor vehicle (remember he did not have a valid driver’s license) but also with illegal possession of a dangerous drug.

After he was arrested, Gant cleverly cited the Arizona Police Department with partaking in an illegal search and seizure. Mr. Gant was apparently a good student because he knew that the police officers had violated his constitutional rights—all citizens of the United States are protected against illegal search and seizures by the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Case: Arizona V. Gant

The Arizona v. Gant case was heard on October 7th of 2008. The case dealt with administrative law; it questioned the “due process” clause of the United States Constitution. The due process clause refers to the government’s obligation to respect, maintain, and uphold the rights of American citizens when they are arrested.

All state governments, as well as the Federal government, are required to uphold this clause; these bodies must preserve and protect a citizen’s liberties and rights. The United States Government must uphold the right to respectful and fair treatment when a citizen is detained by police officers.

In Arizona v. Gant, Mr. Gant said that the Arizona police officers who pulled him over-performed an illegal search of his car. The search was conducted without a warrant; a warrant is the expressed legal permission for the police to enter a citizen’s personal or private property with the intent to find illegal things.

Mr. Gant said that the Arizona police officers acted without probable cause. The United States Supreme Court in Gant v. Arizona ruled in favor of Mr. Gant, stating that the police officers conducted an illegal search because they did not have probable cause to enter Mr. Grant’s vehicle. The police officers could only search for Mr. Gant’s car if there was something alarming about the vehicle. Something that made the police officers curious and made them think, “Hey something illegal is going on here.”

The Supreme Court ruled that the Arizona police department lacked evidence to search Mr. Gant’s car. In Gant V. Arizona the court ruled that the police could only assume Mr. Gant was in violation of just the illegal operation of a car. Because of this, the Supreme Court overruled Mr. Gant’s conviction of illegal possession of guns and drugs.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. Gant in Gant v. Arizona because the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution does not allow police officers or any government workers to conduct unlawful search and seizures of a citizen’s personal belongings.

Article 7 Overview

Article VII of the United States Constitution reads, “The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.” This article outlines the process by which the Constitution was ratified and became effective between the ratifying states. The significance of Article VII cannot be overstated, as it played a crucial role in the establishment of the United States as a constitutional republic.

The ratification process of the Constitution was no easy task. It required the approval of nine out of thirteen states. This was not a simple majority, but rather a supermajority, as it required the agreement of a two-thirds majority. The framers of the Constitution understood that the establishment of a new government required significant support from the states. Furthermore, they acknowledged the importance of having a strong and effective central government to maintain order and promote the general welfare of the country.

The ratification process began on September 17, 1787, when the Constitution was signed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. The document was then sent to the states for their consideration. Nine states ratified the document by June 1788, and the Constitution went into effect on March 4, 1789, when the new government was inaugurated.

The ratification of the Constitution was not without its detractors. The Anti-Federalists, a group of individuals who opposed the Constitution, argued that it gave too much power to the central government and threatened the liberty of the people. They also claimed that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual rights and lacked a bill of rights. In response to these concerns, the Federalists, those who supported the Constitution, agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights, which includes the first ten amendments, was added in 1791.

Impact on the United States

The significance of Article VII can be seen in the impact it had on the formation of the United States. Without the ratification of the Constitution, there would be no United States as we know it today. The ratification of the Constitution led to the establishment of a powerful central government that has helped maintain order and stability in the country. Furthermore, the ratification of the Constitution set a precedent for future constitutional amendments and the way in which they are ratified.

In addition to its historical significance, Article VII continues to play a role in shaping current events. States continue to ratify new amendments to the Constitution as they are proposed. For example, when the Fourteenth Amendment was proposed in 1866, Congress required the ratification of three-fourths of the states before it could be added to the Constitution. The ratification process of the Fourteenth Amendment was tumultuous, as many states initially rejected it before ultimately ratifying it in 1868.

Today, Article VII remains relevant in the ongoing fight for constitutional amendments. For example, the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which would guarantee equal rights for women in the Constitution, was first proposed in 1972. However, the amendment failed to receive the required ratification by three-fourths of the states before the deadline in 1982. In recent years, several states have voted to ratify the amendment, and Congress is currently considering extending the deadline for ratification.

Article VII has also influenced the way laws are made and implemented in individual states. The Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of the federal government, but it also leaves room for states to make their own laws and regulations. Each state has its own constitution, which often includes provisions that allow for revisions and amendments. These changes must go throusgh a similar ratification process as the Constitution, requiring a supermajority of support from the states.

Conclusion

In summary, Article VII of the United States Constitution played a significant role in the establishment of the United States as a constitutional republic. The ratification of the Constitution was no easy task, but the supermajority required by Article VII ensured that the new government would have sufficient support from the states. Furthermore, the ratification of the Constitution set a precedent for future constitutional amendments and the way in which they are ratified. Today, Article VII remains relevant in the ongoing fight for constitutional amendments, and it continues to influence the way laws are made and implemented in individual states.

What is Article 7 of the Constitution?

Article 7 of the U.S. Constitution is the very last article of the United States Constitution. Article 7 explains how many state ratifications are needed in order for the proposed Constitution to take place in the United States and how a state could go about ratifying the Constitution. Before the Constitution, all of the states were following the government that was created in the Articles of Confederation.

How is Article 7 Broken Down?

While many other Articles of the Constitution are broken down into sections and clauses, Article 7 of the United States Constitution is just one sentence long.

Text of Article 7 of the Constitution

The text of Article 7 is only one sentence long. This clause says the following:

” The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.”

Background of Article 7 of the Constitution 

According to Article 7, at least nine states needed to ratify the Constitution in order for it to be applied to all of the states. The states began ratifying the Constitution on December 7, 1787, when the Delaware legislature ratified the United States Constitution. The ninth state to ratify was New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. At this point, the only states who had not ratified out of the thirteen original colonies were Virginia, North Carolina, and New York. It was important to have the rest of the states ratify because Virginia had the most people living and New York was the richest state. These two states eventually ratified before Congress of the Confederation set up March 4, 1789, as the day to start proceeding under the United States Government. Rhode Island and North Carolina ratified the United States Constitution after the Bill of Rights were given to the states to ratify.

The Order of Ratifying By the States

It took two and a half years for all of the states to ratify the United States Constitution. They did this in the following order:

• Delaware on December 7, 1787

• Pennsylvania on December 12, 1787

• New Jersey on December 18, 1787

• Georgia on January 2, 1788

• Connecticut on January 9, 1788

• Massachusetts on February 6, 1788

• Maryland on April 28, 1788

• South Carolina on May 23, 1788

• New Hampshire on June 21, 1788

• Virginia on June 25, 1788

• New York on July 26, 1788

• North Carolina on November 21, 1789

• Rhode Island on May 29, 1790

Roger Sherman: A Founding Father and Influential Politician

Roger Sherman is a name that may not be as well-known as some of the other Founding Fathers of the United States, but his contributions to the nation were just as important. He was a man of many talents – a lawyer, politician, and even a scientist. Ov

Roger Sherman was born on April 19th, 1721 in Newton, Massachusetts. He was the second son of William and Mehetable Sherman, who were both from families that had settled in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the late 1600s. Roger’s father was a farmer and a shoemaker, and the Shermans were not a wealthy family.

At the age of 19, Roger Sherman moved to Connecticut to work as a clerk in a store in New Milford. While he was working there, he began to read law books in his spare time, and he eventually became an apprentice to a lawyer in New Milford. In 1743, he was admitted to the bar and set up his own law practice in New Milford.

Career as a Politician

Roger Sherman’s career in politics began in 1755, when he was elected to the Connecticut General Assembly. He would go on to serve in this legislature for many years, and he also served as a justice of the peace, a judge, and a member of the governor’s council.

Sherman was a strong supporter of American independence, and he was one of the original members of the Continental Congress in 1774. He was also one of five men who were appointed to draft the Declaration of Independence in 1776. While he did not write the famous document himself, he played an important role in its creation. He was known for his ability to compromise and find common ground, and he helped to bring the various factions within the Continental Congress together.

Sherman continued to serve in the Continental Congress until 1781, when he was appointed to serve on the committee that drafted the Articles of Confederation. He is credited with proposing the Great Compromise, which solved a heated debate between large and small states over representation in Congress. This compromise created a bicameral legislature with equal representation in the Senate and representation by population in the House of Representatives.

In 1783, Sherman was elected as the first mayor of New Haven, Connecticut. He would go on to serve in various positions in the Connecticut government over the next decade, including as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787.

Contributions to Drafting the United States Constitution

Roger Sherman’s most significant contribution to American government may well have been his work in drafting the United States Constitution. He was one of the most active and influential members of the convention that drafted the document, which would become the foundation of the American political system.

Sherman was a strong proponent of a strong central government, but he was also concerned about protecting the rights of the individual states. This led him to support the creation of a system of federalism, where power would be shared between the central government and the states.

Throughout the course of the convention, Sherman played a key role in shaping many of the key provisions of the Constitution. He was a member of both the Committee of Detail and the Committee of Style, which were responsible for organizing and revising the various proposals that were put forward by the delegates.

Sherman was also instrumental in creating the Connecticut Compromise, which resolved a dispute over representation in Congress that had threatened to derail the entire process. This compromise set up a bicameral legislature with equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, much like the Great Compromise had done for the Articles of Confederation.

Later Life and Legacy

After the Constitutional Convention, Roger Sherman continued to serve in various positions of government. In 1789, he was elected to serve as a representative in the United States House of Representatives, and he served in this capacity until his death in 1793.

Throughout his career, Sherman was known for his honesty, his integrity, and his devotion to the cause of American independence. He was also a deeply religious man, and he believed that the Christian faith was essential to the survival of the American republic.

Today, Roger Sherman is often overshadowed by his more famous contemporaries like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin. However, his contributions to American government cannot be overlooked. He played a key role in drafting three of the most important documents in American history – the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the United States Constitution – and he helped to shape the American political system in countless ways.

His legacy lives on today in the form of the Connecticut Compromise, which remains an essential part of the American political system. It is a testament to his vision and his skill as a statesman that the federal government he helped to create is still functioning more than two centuries after its creation.

Founding Father: Roger Sherman

Early Life of Roger Sherman

Roger Sherman was born on April 19, 1721, in Newton, Massachusetts. When he was two years old, his family moved to Stoughton where he attended the country school and began learning how to be a cobbler from his father. As a young boy, Roger Sherman wanted to read and learn and did as much as possible during his spare time.

Two years after his father died in 1743, Roger Sherman moved to New Milford, Connecticut to live with his older brother. Here he worked as a surveyor, purchased a store, and studied law. In 1749, he married Elizabeth Hartwell, with whom he had 7 children. He also became a lawyer in 1754. From here, Roger Sherman began his political career. He was a representative for New Milford in the Connecticut Assembly between 1755 and 1756 and from 1758 to 1761.

Political Career

In 1761, Roger Sherman decided to stop practicing law and then moved to New Haven, Connecticut. He managed two different stores then and also became a friend and supporter of Yale College. He was also the treasurer of Yale College for many years. 3 years after his wife’s death in 1763, Roger Sherman got married a second time to Rebecca Prescott. He had 8 children with her.

Throughout this time, Roger Sherman was a very important man. He was a justice of the peace and the county judge, but then he became an associate judge of the Superior Court of Connecticut, he represented both houses of the assembly. Although Roger Sherman did not like extremism, he still fought against Great Britain.

Continental Congress

Roger Sherman was influential as a member of the Continental Congress between 1774 to 1781 and 1783 to 1784. Roger Sherman was a member of the committees that drafted the Articles of Confederation as well as the Declaration of Independence. He was also involved in other things like Indian affairs or military issues.

When Roger Sherman was in Congress, he still participated in local politics. He was still the judge of the Superior Court of Connecticut. He was also a member of the council of safety. In 1784, Roger Sherman became mayor of New Haven.

The last thing Roger Sherman served as was a representative in the United States House of Representatives from 1789 to 1791 and then the Senate between 1791and 179. Here he supported the Federalists.

Roger Sherman died at the age of 72 in New Haven on July 24, 1793. He is buried in the Grove Street Cemetery.

Facts about Roger Sherman

•Roger Sherman had 15 children.

•Roger Sherman held offices in all three branches of the government.

•Roger Sherman was the second oldest person at the Constitutional Convention.

Atkins v. Virginia was a landmark case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2002. The case dealt with the constitutionality of the death penalty for individuals with intellectual disabilities. In this article, we will delve into the details of the case, including how it came about, how it ended, the process of the case, and the way it has influenced the United States legal system. We will also provide 10 interesting facts about the court case.

Background

The case began in 1996 when a man named Daryl Renard Atkins was convicted of capital murder in Virginia for his involvement in the robbery and murder of a young man named Eric Nesbitt. Atkins was sentenced to death, and his lawyers immediately began to appeal the sentence. The issue at the heart of the case was whether it was constitutional to execute an individual with intellectual disabilities.

Process

After several rounds of appeals, the case eventually made its way to the United States Supreme Court. In 2002, the Court heard oral arguments and issued a ruling in Atkins v. Virginia. The Court held that it was unconstitutional to execute an individual with intellectual disabilities. The decision was based on the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishments.”

The Court found that the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities was cruel and unusual because these individuals lacked the moral culpability that was necessary to justify the death penalty. The Court also noted that a majority of states had already banned the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities, and that the trend towards abolition of this practice was evidence of a national consensus against it.

Impact on the US legal system

The Atkins v. Virginia case had a significant impact on the legal landscape of the United States. The decision established that individuals with intellectual disabilities were entitled to the same constitutional protections as anyone else, and that the death penalty was not an appropriate punishment for these individuals. The decision also helped to shift the national conversation around capital punishment, highlighting the need for greater protections for vulnerable populations.

Below are Ten Interesting Facts about Atkins v. Virginia:

1. Daryl Atkins had an IQ of 59, which is below the threshold for intellectual disability.

2. In 2002, there were 20 states that authorized the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities.

3. At the time of the case, the Court had already banned the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities in several other contexts, such as juveniles and the mentally ill.

4. The Court’s decision in Atkins v. Virginia was a 6-3 decision, with Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and William Rehnquist dissenting.

5. The Court’s decision in Atkins v. Virginia was influenced by the fact that several other countries had already abolished the death penalty for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

6. The decision in Atkins v. Virginia has been used as a basis for expanding legal protections for individuals with intellectual disabilities in other areas, such as voting rights and access to healthcare.

7. In 2014, the Court extended the protections afforded to individuals with intellectual disabilities in Atkins v. Virginia to juveniles, ruling that it was unconstitutional to impose a mandatory sentence of life without parole on a juvenile.

8. The decision in Atkins v. Virginia was greeted with a mix of praise and criticism from legal experts and advocacy groups.

9. The case helped to shift the national conversation about the death penalty in the United States, highlighting the need for greater protections for vulnerable populations.

10. The decision in Atkins v. Virginia has been cited in numerous subsequent cases dealing with the rights of individuals with disabilities, including cases dealing with employment discrimination, education, and housing.

The Background: Atkins V. Virginia

The case of Atkins V. Virginia starts off with a man named Daryl Renard Atkins and his friend. These two men were convicted of robbing and murdering a man. When Mr. Atkins and his friend told the police about what happened, they gave two different stories. The mix-up was primarily due to the fact that Mr. Atkins was handicapped; his brain did not properly work. The presiding jury over the original Atkins V. Virginia case sentenced Mr. Atkins to death. The jury accepted his friend’s testimony as truth and thought that Mr. Atkins was lying.

The Case: Atkins V. Virginia

The case of Atkins v. Virginia dealt with administrative law. This legal field regulates the due process clause which refers to the government’s obligation to maintain and respect the legal rights of American citizens in the event they are arrested. All governments in the United States are required, by law, to protect and preserve a citizen’s human liberties and rights. This means that the government is required to treat all arrested citizens fairly.

Mr. Atkins appealed the death sentence. His lawyer said that the execution of an individual who is medically determined to be handicapped was a direct violation of Mr. Atkins’ 8th Amendment rights. This constitutional amendment states that the government may not punish an individual in a cruel or unusual manner. Mr. Atkins’s lawyer thought the government should not be allowed to sentence Mr. Atkins to death because he was mentally challenged.

The Ruling: Atkins V. Virginia

In Atkins V. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the execution of any person who is mentally handicapped or challenged was a direct violation of the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Not only did the Supreme Court not allow Mr. Atkins to be put to death, but they also overturned the case. The Supreme Court instead put both Mr. Atkins and his friend in jail for the remainder of their lives.

The court ruling in Atkins V. Virginia was reversed because the 8th amendment addresses criminal procedure; the amendment does not allow any actions that are considered cruel and unusual with regards to prosecuting a citizen.

Article 1

Article I of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government. The branch, composed of the House of Representatives and Senate, is responsible for making laws.

Section 1 of Article I states that all legislative powers shall be vested in the Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. Section 2 outlines the requirements for becoming a member of the House, including being at least 25 years old, a citizen for at least 7 years, and a resident of the state being represented. Section 3 outlines the requirements for becoming a senator, including being at least 30 years old, a citizen for at least 9 years, and a resident of the state being represented.

Sections 4 and 5 establish the procedures for holding elections, and organizing and conducting the activities of Congress. Furthermore, Section 6 grants members of Congress immunity for anything they say during a session of Congress. “They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same.”

Section 7 outlines the process for passing bills and laws, including the requirement that all bills raising revenue must originate in the House of Representatives. Section 8 outlines the powers of Congress, which include declaring war, regulating commerce, providing for the common defense, and establishing immigration policy.

Sections 9 and 10 outline the things that Congress is prohibited from doing, such as passing bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, and entering into treaties without the consent of the President.

In summary, Article I of the Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government and outlines the procedures and requirements for becoming a member of Congress. It also sets out the powers of Congress and the things that it is prohibited from doing.

Article 2

Article II of the Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government. The branch is responsible for enforcing laws and executing the directives of Congress and the President.

Section 1 of Article II outlines the requirements for becoming President, including being a natural-born citizen, at least 35 years old, and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. It also establishes the Electoral College as the method for electing the President.

Sections 2 and 3 detail the powers of the President, which include serving as commander-in-chief of the military, granting pardons, and making appointments. Section 4 outlines the process for removing the President from office through impeachment.

In summary, Article II of the Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government and outlines the requirements for becoming President. It also sets out the powers of the President and the process for removing the President from office.

Article 3

Article III of the Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. The branch is responsible for interpreting and implementing the laws passed by Congress and the executive orders issued by the President.

Section 1 of Article III establishes the Supreme Court and gives Congress the power to establish inferior courts. Sections 2 and 3 describe the types of cases that the federal courts have jurisdiction over and outline the rights of the accused in criminal cases.

In summary, Article III of the Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government and outlines the types of cases that the federal courts have jurisdiction over.

Article 4

Article IV of the Constitution details the relationship between the states and the federal government. It says that “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.” This means that the legal decisions made in one state should be honored in every other state. It also requires that the federal government ensure that every state is provided a republican form of government.

Section 2 outlines the privileges and immunities that each state is granted, including the right to travel freely and be protected from discrimination. Section 3 establishes the process for admitting new states to the union.

In summary, Article IV of the Constitution outlines the relationship between the states and the federal government and sets out the rights and privileges that are granted to each state.

Article 5

Article V of the Constitution outlines the process for amending the Constitution. It states that amendments may be proposed by either Congress or a national convention called by Congress. A proposed amendment must be ratified by three-quarters of the states in order to become law.

In summary, Article V of the Constitution outlines the process for amending the Constitution and establishing new laws.

Article 6

Article VI of the Constitution establishes the supremacy of federal law over state law. It also requires all federal and state officials to swear an oath of allegiance to the Constitution.

“In full faith and credit” of Article IV means that the courts of one state must honor the decisions and judgments of other states’ courts. The Constitution specifies that, “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.”

In summary, Article VI of the Constitution establishes the supremacy of federal law over state law and requires all federal and state officials to swear an oath of allegiance to the Constitution.

Article 7

Article VII of the Constitution establishes the process for ratifying the Constitution. It required the approval of nine states in order to become law.

In summary, Article VII of the Constitution establishes the process for ratifying the Constitution.

Conclusion

The Constitution was created to establish a system of government that would protect individual liberties and guarantee the basic rights of all citizens. Each of the articles in the Constitution was designed to outline the responsibilities of each branch of the government and to create a framework for the functioning of a democratic republic. By setting out the responsibilities of each branch, the Constitution ensures that no single branch becomes too powerful and that the government remains accountable to the people.

Understanding the Articles of the United States Constitution

The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution is made of the Preamble and seven different articles. Together, these articles are the foundation for how the United States government is organized. The Articles of the Constitution also explain how the federal government interacts with the citizens, states, and people of the country.

Who Wrote the Articles of the Constitution?

The Constitution and all of its Articles were written in 1787. Between May 1787 and September 1787, the group of men now known as the Framers met to talk about what should be included in the Articles of the United States Constitution. Because the current government under the Articles of Confederation did not work well, the framers hoped to create a better government. There were 55 Framers of the United States Constitution, included George Washington, James Madison, Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, and more. The Framers had many arguments and debates about what should be included in the Articles. They also made many speeches. After a lot of talking, they finally decided on all the details of the Constitution.

When Were the Articles of the Constitution Ratified?

The Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states in order to become the law of the land. After two and a half years, all 13 states agreed to ratify the Articles of the Constitution. The Constitution and its Articles were adopted into the United States on September 17, 1787, during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.

What are the Articles of Articles of The Constitution?

Together, the articles of the constitution work to establish the branches of the federal government and describe what powers they have.

Article 1 of the Constitution

Article 1 gives Congress its powers and limits. Congress is the branch of the government who can make laws for the country. Article 1 also creates the two sections of Congress, the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Article 2 of the Constitution

Article 2 of the Constitution makes the executive branch of the government. The Executive branch has the responsibility and authority for the administration on a daily basis. In the United States, the executive branch is made up of the President and executive officers.

Article 3 of the Constitution

Article 3 of the Constitution creates a judicial branch in the United States. The Judicial branch is the court system that interprets the law. In the United States, the judicial branch includes the Supreme Court and the lower courts which are made by Congress.

Article 4 of the Constitution

Article 4 of the Constitution talks about the states. Article 4 talks about what responsibilities and duties the states have along with what responsibilities the federal government has to each state.

Article 5 of the Constitution

Article 5 says that the only way the Constitution can be changed is by adding an amendment.

Article 6 of the Constitution

Article 6 says that any debts or engagements that the country had before adopting the Constitution are still valid. Article 6 also says that the Constitution is the highest law and that all officers and judges have to uphold the Constitution.

Article 7 of the Constitution

Article 7 of the U.S. Constitution is the final article of the Constitution. This article explains how many states need to ratify the Constitution.

Introduction

Samuel Adams was a Founding Father of the United States of America, a Bostonian statesman, and a political philosopher known for his dedication to the American Revolution and his leadership in the struggle against British rule. As a member of the Continental Congress, he helped to draft the Declaration of Independence, and as a signatory of the document, he committed his life and fortune to the cause of American liberty. Through his work as a statesman and political philosopher, Samuel Adams helped to establish the fundamental principles of American democracy and set forth a vision for a nation that would be governed by the people, for the people.

Early Life and Family

Samuel Adams was born on September 27, 1722, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Samuel Adams Sr. and Mary Fifield. His father was a prosperous brewer, and his mother was the daughter of a wealthy merchant. Samuel Adams Sr. was an active member of the Old South Church, and he instilled in his son a deep sense of religious piety and a commitment to public service.

Samuel Adams was the second of twelve children, and he grew up in a household that valued education and civic engagement. He attended Boston Latin School, where he excelled as a student and developed a keen interest in politics and public affairs. After completing his studies at Boston Latin, Adams went on to study at Harvard College, where he received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1740.

After completing his studies at Harvard, Samuel Adams returned to Boston and began working in his father’s brewery. Despite his initial reluctance to enter the family business, Samuel Adams eventually became a successful brewer in his own right, and he used his position in the industry to promote his political and social views.

The Boston Massacre and the Tea Party

Samuel Adams first rose to prominence in American politics during the years leading up to the American Revolution. He played an instrumental role in organizing the protests against British taxation and in mobilizing public support for American independence.

One of Samuel Adams’ most significant contributions to the cause of American freedom was his role in the Boston Massacre. On March 5, 1770, British soldiers fired into a crowd of Bostonians, killing five and injuring several others. Samuel Adams seized upon the incident as an opportunity to galvanize public support for the American cause, and he used his position as a legislator to call for a full investigation into the matter.

Adams’ efforts to hold the British soldiers accountable for their actions helped to fuel the flames of the American Revolution, and he continued to be a vocal advocate for American independence in the years that followed. He was a key leader in the Boston Tea Party of 1773, when colonists dressed as Native Americans dumped British tea into Boston Harbor in protest of the Tea Act. His activism and leadership helped to set the stage for the American Revolution and paved the way for American independence.

The American Revolution and Beyond

Samuel Adams’ contributions to the American Revolution extended far beyond his role in the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. He was a member of the Continental Congress, serving from 1774 to 1781, and he was one of the primary architects of the American Revolution.

During his time in Congress, Adams helped to draft the Declaration of Independence, which laid out the fundamental principles of American democracy and set forth a vision for a nation that would be governed by the people, for the people. He played an instrumental role in securing the support of the Southern colonies for the Patriot cause, and he worked tirelessly to promote the principles of American democracy throughout the war.

After the war, Samuel Adams continued to serve as a leader in American politics, serving as the governor of Massachusetts from 1793 to 1797. He remained a vocal advocate for individual liberty and democratic governance and continued to promote his political and social views until his death in 1803.

Legacy and Impact

Samuel Adams’ contributions to the American Revolution and the nation he helped to create have had far-reaching consequences. Through his leadership as a statesman and political philosopher, Adams helped to establish the fundamental principles of American democracy and set forth a vision for a nation that would be governed by the people, for the people.

His commitment to individual liberty and democratic governance has influenced generations of political leaders, and his legacy continues to shape American politics and society to this day. Samuel Adams was a visionary leader and a true patriot, and his contributions to America will be remembered for generations to come.

Conclusion

Samuel Adams was a Founding Father, a Bostonian statesman, and a political philosopher known for his dedication to the American Revolution and his leadership in the struggle against British rule. Through his work as a statesman and political philosopher, Samuel Adams helped to establish the fundamental principles of American democracy and set forth a vision for a nation that would be governed by the people, for the people.

His legacy continues to shape American politics and society to this day, and his contributions to America will be remembered for generations to come. As the United States of America continues to face new challenges and navigate an ever-changing political landscape, the ideals and values championed by Samuel Adams will remain as relevant as ever, serving as a beacon of hope and inspiration for all Americans.

Founding Father: Samuel Adams

Early Life of Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams was born on September 27, 1722, in Quincy, Massachusetts. His family was well off and respected in the community. Samuel Adams went to Boston Latin School and then went on to go to Harvard College. Afterward, he got his master’s degree. Samuel Adams decided to get involved in the business. Unfortunately, he lost all the money that his father had saved for him.

Samuel Adams and Politics

After this, Samuel Adams decided to go into politics, which he was very good at. He could work very late and make great speeches. He also led meetings in houses and taverns where he explained that Americans should have the right to govern themselves. In 1763, the British government announced that they would start taxing American trade. Samuel Adams was very upset and wrote a letter saying that if a trade could be taxed, what else could the British government start tax? These laws would slowly ruin any chance of the colonies being able to govern themselves.

Samuel Adams became very famous for what he said. Soon, Samuel Adams was at the very center of the patriotic movement that wanted the colonies to have its own representation in Great Britain’s government. This was also the very beginning of the movement for independence. Samuel Adams started the Country Party, which included many farmers who also believed in his ideas.

Around this time, Samuel Adams was also a founder and important member of the Sons of Liberty, a secret organization that supported independence for the colonies. This was the organization that was involved in the Boston Tea Party.

In 1765, Samuel Adams was elected as the representative of Boston to the Massachusetts legislature. Here, Samuel Adams influenced many of the laws that were made. Samuel Adams was on every single committee and he went to every event. Samuel Adams also wrote many arguments against the actions of the British government.

Samuel Adams became better known over the next few years. One of the most important points was during the Boston Massacre of 1790. Samuel Adams realized that the colonists could not win against the British Army. Even though he was very angry that six Americans had been killed, he convinced the governor of Massachusetts to remove the troops from Boston for a while to prevent more fighting. Doing this gave him even more respect from both sides.

Continental Congress

Samuel Adams went to the First Continental Congress as the delegate from Boston. Samuel Adams also went to the Second Continental Congress as well, where he argued for independence from Great Britain. He was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence.

During the Revolutionary War, he urged Americans to fight for their independence from the British.

At the Constitutional Convention, he signed the new Constitution, but only he was sure that a Bill of Rights would follow afterward. Samuel Adams served in the Continental Congress until his attempt to retire in 1781. He was then elected him to the state senate and afterward to the office of lieutenant governor. After Governor John Hancock passed away in 1794, Samuel Adams became Governor until he retired once more in 1797. The next six years of his life were very quiet. He passed away at the age of 82 in 1803.

Facts about Samuel Adams

•Samuel Adams was born in the same area as John Adams and John Hancock.

•At the age of 42, he did not have enough money to support his family. Thankfully friends and neighbors helped him.

•Samuel Adams had 6 children, but only two of them lived to adulthood.

Baker v. Carr: The Landmark Case that Revolutionized Political Representation

Introduction

Baker v. Carr, a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1962, is a pivotal moment in American legal history. This case fundamentally changed the landscape of political representation in the United States by addressing the issue of “one person, one vote.” In this 2000-word article, we will delve into the details of the Baker v. Carr case, exploring its background, significance, and enduring impact on American democracy.

1. Historical Background

To understand the significance of Baker v. Carr, we must first grasp the historical context in which it emerged. In the early 1960s, the United States was undergoing significant demographic changes. Urbanization was on the rise, with more Americans living in cities than ever before. This shift in population distribution led to an imbalance in political representation, as legislative districts had not been updated in decades to reflect these changes.

In Tennessee, where the Baker v. Carr case originated, the state’s legislative districts had remained largely unchanged since 1901. As a result, urban areas had become vastly underrepresented, while rural areas enjoyed disproportionate political power. Rural voters held more influence per capita than their urban counterparts, leading to a growing sense of injustice and inequality in the political process.

1. The Legal Challenge

The legal challenge in Baker v. Carr was spearheaded by Charles Baker, a resident of Shelby County, Tennessee. Baker and other plaintiffs argued that the state’s legislative districts violated the principle of “equal protection under the law” guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. They contended that the state’s failure to reapportion legislative districts in light of significant population shifts amounted to a denial of their constitutional rights.

Their case was grounded in the fact that some rural districts had ten times fewer residents than certain urban districts. This meant that the votes of rural residents carried significantly more weight than those of their urban counterparts. Despite the obvious disparities, the state of Tennessee had consistently failed to address the issue through legislative action, prompting the plaintiffs to turn to the courts for relief.

III. Legal Arguments

The legal arguments presented in Baker v. Carr were complex and revolved around key constitutional principles. The plaintiffs argued that the lack of reapportionment effectively diluted their voting power, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They contended that every citizen’s vote should carry equal weight, regardless of their place of residence. In essence, they were calling for a shift away from the traditional notion of districting, where political boundaries were drawn to favor rural areas over urban ones.

On the other side, the state of Tennessee argued that the issue of legislative apportionment was a “political question” and, therefore, not within the purview of the federal courts. They claimed that the Constitution gave state legislatures the authority to determine their own district boundaries, and that federal courts should not interfere in this process. This argument was rooted in the long-standing tradition of judicial restraint in matters considered political.

1. Supreme Court Decision

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a 6-2 decision, with Justice William Brennan writing the majority opinion. The Court held that the issue of legislative apportionment was not a political question beyond judicial review, as the state of Tennessee had argued. Instead, the Court affirmed that it had the authority to address cases involving alleged violations of the Equal Protection Clause.

Justice Brennan’s opinion laid the groundwork for the “one person, one vote” principle. He wrote, “Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests.” This statement underscored the Court’s commitment to ensuring that every citizen’s vote carried equal weight, regardless of where they lived.

1. Significance of Baker v. Carr

Baker v. Carr had far-reaching implications for American democracy. The decision had several notable consequences and set important precedents:

1. “One Person, One Vote” Principle: The Court’s ruling established the principle that legislative districts must be drawn in a way that ensures equal representation for all citizens. This was a significant departure from the previous practice of using outdated district boundaries that favored rural areas.

2. Judicial Activism: Baker v. Carr marked a shift toward judicial activism in cases involving constitutional issues. The Court’s willingness to address the matter signaled that the federal judiciary would not shy away from intervening in cases where constitutional rights were at stake.

3. Political Realignment: The decision had a profound impact on political realignment, as it empowered urban areas that had long been underrepresented. Legislatures across the country were forced to redraw district boundaries to adhere to the new standard, rebalancing political power.

4. Voting Rights Act of 1965: Baker v. Carr laid the groundwork for subsequent civil rights legislation, including the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This landmark legislation aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting and further reinforced the principle of “one person, one vote.”

5. Increased Political Participation: By ensuring more equitable representation, Baker v. Carr encouraged increased political participation among underrepresented groups. People who had previously felt marginalized were now more likely to engage in the political process, knowing their votes carried equal weight.

1. Subsequent Developments

While Baker v. Carr was a significant milestone in the pursuit of fair and equal representation, it was not the end of the journey. Subsequent developments and cases have continued to shape the landscape of American democracy:

1. Reynolds v. Sims (1964): Building on the precedent set by Baker v. Carr, the Court further clarified the “one person, one vote” principle in Reynolds v. Sims. This case established that both houses of state legislatures must be apportioned based on population.

2. Gerrymandering: The issue of gerrymandering, where district boundaries are manipulated to favor one political party, remains a challenge in American politics. The Court has grappled with this issue in cases like Gill v. Whitford (2018) and Rucho v. Common Cause (2019).

3. Ongoing Battles for Voting Rights: Voting rights continue to be a contentious issue in American politics. Laws that restrict access to the ballot, such as voter ID requirements and restrictions on early voting, have sparked legal challenges. These cases are often framed in the context of ensuring equal access to the ballot box.

VII. Conclusion

Baker v. Carr was a landmark Supreme Court case that reshaped the American political landscape. Its “one person, one vote” principle laid the foundation for more equitable representation and increased political participation. The decision not only corrected a glaring imbalance in political power but also set the stage for subsequent civil rights legislation and further advancements in the fight for equal access to the ballot.

While the legacy of Baker v. Carr is undeniable, it is important to recognize that the struggle for fair representation and equal voting rights continues. As the United States evolves demographically and politically, the principles established by this historic case remain as relevant as ever, guiding the nation toward a more inclusive and equitable democracy.

Baker v. Carr is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that was instrumental in clarifying the role of the federal courts in addressing issues of voter representation and redistricting. The case was heard by the Court in 1962, and its decision marked an important step forward in the protection of voting rights and fair representation in American politics. This article will examine the details of the Baker v. Carr case, including its background, process, and impact on the American legal system.

Background

In the early 1960s, Tennessee’s state legislature had not redistricted since 1901. By 1960, the state’s urban areas had grown significantly, while rural areas had declined in population. This resulted in a significant disparity in the number of voters represented by each state legislator. In some cases, urban voters had up to ten times less representation than rural voters.

Charles Baker, an urban voter in Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against the Secretary of State, Joe Carr, arguing that the state’s apportionment scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Baker and his team of lawyers argued that the districting scheme resulted in the dilution of urban voters’ voting power and represented a clear case of vote discrimination. The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court.

The Process

The Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. Carr was issued in 1962, and it was significant for several reasons. In the opinion, the Court held that the federal courts could intervene in cases relating to state legislative apportionment, something that it had previously been reluctant to do. In addition, the Court recognized that the issue of voter representation was a justiciable matter and established the principle of “one person, one vote.”

Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the majority opinion, which held that the Court had jurisdiction to hear challenges to the apportionment of seats in state legislatures. The opinion also ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population, ensuring that each individual’s vote carried equal weight.

Impact on the US Legal System

The Baker v. Carr decision had a profound impact on the American legal system in several ways. First, it established the principle of “one person, one vote,” which requires state legislative districts to be drawn in such a way that each individual’s vote carries equal weight. This has helped to ensure that each citizen’s vote is treated equally, regardless of the political composition of their district.

Second, the decision in Baker v. Carr established that the United States Supreme Court had the power to hear and decide cases relating to state legislative apportionment. This has allowed the Court to take an active role in protecting voting rights and ensuring fair representation in American politics.

Ten Interesting Facts About the Baker v. Carr Case

1. The case was originally titled “Baker v. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee.”

2. The case was heard by the Supreme Court in 1962, making it a significant landmark in the Civil Rights movement.

3. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, was an African-American citizen who lived in Memphis, Tennessee.

4. Baker argued that the state’s legislative districts were malapportioned and that they discriminated against urban voters.

5. The Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. Carr established the principle of “one person, one vote,” which requires states to draw legislative districts based on population.

6. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the majority opinion in the case, which held that the Court had jurisdiction to hear challenges to state legislative apportionment.

7. The decision in Baker v. Carr paved the way for increased involvement by the federal courts in addressing issues of voter representation and redistricting.

8. The case was one of many important Supreme Court decisions in the 1960s that helped to establish Civil Rights protections for African Americans and other minority groups.

9. The decision in Baker v. Carr was widely praised by Civil Rights leaders and advocates, although some critics argued that it represented an overreaching of federal power.

10. Today, the principles established by the Baker v. Carr decision continue to play a significant role in the American legal system’s approach to voter representation and redistricting, ensuring that each individual’s vote carries equal weight regardless of the political affiliations of their district.

The Background: Baker V. Carr

A law in Tennessee says that all the towns are required to provide population statistics to the state every 10 years. Each town is required to do this so the state can accurately determine jurisdictional boundaries. Mr. Charles Baker explained that Tennessee did not follow this law. In response to this accusation, the state of Tennessee said that the law to remap towns was created for political purposes and that they were following the legislation. Baker did not accept this excuse; he thought the state was required to follow the law in an exact fashion.

Baker’s argument revolved around the Supremacy Clause. This part of the Constitution states that the Federal Government has the right to control and maintain jurisdiction over state laws.

The Trial: Baker V. Carr

Baker V. Carr dealt with Administrative law. This field of law is associated with how the Federal Government treats its citizens and how the government institutes its programs, creates its agencies and establishes laws. In Baker v. Carr, Mr. Charles Baker went up against Joe Carr who was an appointed representative of Tennessee. In Baker V. Carr, Baker said that the law upheld by the Tennessee Constitution regarding the establishment of districts was a violation of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Verdict: Baker V. Carr

In Baker v. Carr, the United States Supreme Court said that Tennessee’s refusal to follow the expressed law of remapping the districts was in direct violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. This clause forces every individual citizen of the United States to be treated equally and without bias with regard to their pursuit of happiness.

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution does not allow the government to infringe on the individual person’s rights to pursue a happy life. Furthermore, Article III of the United States Constitution states that the Federal Government is allowed to rule over all laws in the event that unfair advantages are present with the creation of a law. This law was created to ensure that an equal legal process was respected throughout the United States.

Thomas Jefferson – A Life of Dedication to America

Born on April 13, 1743 in Virginia, Thomas Jefferson was a Founding Father of the United States, a major proponent of democracy, and the third United States President. Beginning as a young lawyer in Virginia, he rose to a position of importance during the American Revolution. Different than many other famous figures from this time, Jefferson was not born into wealth and privilege. Instead, his own hard work and dedication to serving the people of America served as the backbone of his life.

In this article, we will explore the life and times of Thomas Jefferson in depth. We will discuss his upbringing, his education, his political career, and his legacy in the history of American politics.

Early Life and Education

Thomas Jefferson was born into a wealthy family in Virginia – the family had been in Virginia since the early 17th century, and made their fortune in tobacco plantations. Unlike many other members of his family, however, Jefferson was raised in an atmosphere of self-discipline, learning, and openness.

In his early years, Jefferson was educated privately in his family home. Later, he attended the College of William and Mary in Virginia and studied law. After graduation, he began practicing law in Virginia, and quickly gained a reputation as an excellent lawyer.

Early Political Career and Views

It wasn’t until the age of 33 that Jefferson entered politics, joining the Virginia House of Burgesses. He quickly became one of the leading voices of the revolutionary movement in Virginia, joining other notable figures such as Patrick Henry and George Washington.

In the early days of the American Revolution, Thomas Jefferson was a strong proponent of independence. He viewed the English government as oppressive, and believed that the colonies should be given the freedom to govern themselves. For this reason, he wrote the Declaration of Independence – a document that continues to serve as a symbol of democracy, freedom and individual rights. 

Jefferson’s views on government were heavily influenced by his reading.  He championed the works of John Locke, a famous English philosopher of the 17th century who argued for individual rights and the concept of “social contract.” This concept of social contract holds that the people have the right to overthrow a government that abuses its power.

Political Career and Accomplishments

After the declaration of independence, Jefferson took his seat in the newly formed Continental Congress. There, he served as a delegate from Virginia, and played an important role in many of the most important debates of the time. In particular, he was instrumental in drafting the Articles of Confederation.

In 1785, Jefferson was appointed as the United States Minister to France. This was a position of considerable responsibility, and one that he served in with great distinction. While in France, he became a good friend of the famous French philosopher Voltaire. 

In 1790, Thomas Jefferson became the first Secretary of State under President George Washington. In this role, he continued to influence policy and serve as one of the primary architects of American democracy. In particular, he was deeply opposed to the expansion of the federal government, and was a strong advocate of states’ rights.

In 1800, Thomas Jefferson won the election to become the third President of the United States. His tenure was marked by many significant accomplishments, including the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of United States. He also established the United States Military Academy at West Point.

Legacy and Impact

Throughout his life, Thomas Jefferson was remembered as a champion of individual rights, democracy, and equality. His brilliant and eloquent writings continue to inspire people all over the world, and helped to define the nature of democratic government. 

Jefferson’s legacy is one that continues to shape American politics and culture today. His thoughts on individual rights, the role of government, and the importance of the people in democracy have continued to inspire generations of leaders and thinkers.

Conclusion

Thomas Jefferson was one of the most important figures in American history. Through his hard work, dedication, and commitment to the cause of democracy, he helped to shape the United States into the nation it is today – a beacon of freedom, democracy, and individual liberty.

Today, we continue to celebrate his life and legacy, and look to his example as we strive to build a more just and equitable society. May his memory live on forever.

Founding Father: Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson was a founding father of the United States, an author of the Declaration of Independence, and the 3rd President of the United States. Aside from being President, Thomas Jefferson was also a legislator, diplomat, lawyer architect, scientist, inventor, writer, agriculturist, and a revolutionary thinker.

Early Life of Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson was born on April 13, 1743, in Shadwell, Virginia. His father was Peter Jefferson, a very successful surveyor and planter in Virginia. His mother was Jane Jefferson, a woman from a wealthy family.

Thomas Jefferson’s Education and Marriage

Thomas Jefferson went to the College of William and Mary between 1760 and 1762. Later, he decided to study law. He passed the bar in 1767 he began practicing law. Thomas Jefferson lived in the Monticello house in Virginia for most of his life.

He built this home on land that he had inherited from his family. In 1772, Thomas Jefferson married Martha Wayles Skelton, who he had six children with. Unfortunately, only two children survived. Thomas Jefferson had about 200 slaves on his property who helped him run the house and grow food.

Thomas Jefferson During Revolutionary America

In 1775, Thomas Jefferson was a delegate to the Continental Congress. Here he helped draft the Declaration of Independence. This draft was then amended by other members of the committee.

The next year, Thomas Jefferson became a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. Here he fought for important issues, like the separation of church and state, as well as other important causes. In 1779, Thomas Jefferson became the Governor of Virginia. However, he resigned in 1781 after the British invaded Virginia. Because Thomas Jefferson had not been prepared for this attack, he became very unpopular in Virginia.

In 1783, Thomas Jefferson was elected to Congress. In 1785, President Washington appointed Thomas Jefferson as the United States Minister to France. In 1789, Washington also made Thomas Jefferson into the Secretary of State. However, Thomas Jefferson resigned on December 31, 1793.

In 1796, Thomas Jefferson ran in the election for President, but he lost against John Adams. Thomas Jefferson became Vice President.

Thomas Jefferson as President

In 1800, Jefferson defeated John Adams and became President of the United States. He was then reelected for a second term in 1804. As President, Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory from France. This purchase in 1803 increased the total area of the United States a lot. After, Thomas Jefferson sent Lewis and Clark to map the new US territory.

Thomas Jefferson’s Later Life

Jefferson retired from office in 1809 and went back home to Monticello. Thomas Jefferson died at his home on July 4, 1826.

Fun Facts about Thomas Jefferson

• Thomas Jefferson died on the 50th anniversary of the day the Declaration of Independence was signed. This was on the same day as John Adam’s death. They were the only two signers who had become presidents.

• In 1814, Thomas Jefferson sold his personal library to the United States government in order to try to restart the Library of Congress. The original one had been burned down during the War of 1812.

• Thomas Jefferson founded the University of Virginia in 1819.

“We the People: The Power and Promise of the Constitution’s Preamble”

Introduction

“We the People,” the opening words of the United States Constitution’s Preamble, are among the most iconic and enduring phrases in American history. These three simple words encapsulate the essence of American democracy, emphasizing the central role of the citizenry in shaping and governing the nation. In this 2000-word article, we will explore the significance, historical context, and enduring relevance of “We the People” in the Constitution’s Preamble.

The Preamble: A Vision for a New Nation

The Preamble serves as an introduction to the United States Constitution, setting the tone and outlining the fundamental purposes of the government it establishes. It reads:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

1. The Source of Sovereignty:

   The opening phrase, “We the People,” boldly declares the ultimate source of governmental authority in the United States. Unlike many other forms of government, where power flows from a monarch, a ruling class, or a military, American democracy is founded on the principle that the people themselves are the sovereigns.

2. A More Perfect Union:

   The Preamble’s aspiration to “form a more perfect Union” reflects the framers’ recognition that the Articles of Confederation, the nation’s first governing document, had proven insufficient in uniting the states. They sought to create a stronger and more cohesive nation.

3. Establishing Justice:

   One of the primary purposes of the Constitution is to establish a system of justice that ensures fairness and equity for all citizens. This commitment to justice has profound implications for civil rights, the rule of law, and the protection of individual liberties.

4. Insuring Domestic Tranquility:

   The Constitution aims to provide stability and peace within the country’s borders. This includes the prevention of domestic violence and the promotion of social harmony, which are essential for a functioning democracy.

5. Providing for the Common Defense:

   National defense is another central concern addressed in the Preamble. It emphasizes the need for a strong military to protect the nation from external threats, underlining the importance of national security.

6. Promoting the General Welfare:

   The Constitution is designed to promote the well-being of all citizens. This phrase underscores the government’s role in addressing social and economic issues that affect the populace, such as public health, education, and infrastructure.

7. Securing the Blessings of Liberty:

   The framers were deeply committed to the idea of individual liberty. They sought to create a government that could protect the freedoms of the people while maintaining order and stability.

8. For Ourselves and Our Posterity:

   The Preamble’s closing words recognize that the Constitution’s impact would extend beyond the present generation. It was designed to be a lasting document that would shape the nation’s destiny for generations to come.

Historical Context

To appreciate the significance of “We the People,” it’s essential to consider the historical context in which the Constitution was drafted. The United States had recently won its independence from British rule through the American Revolution. However, the Articles of Confederation, the nation’s initial governing framework, had proven ineffective in providing a stable and cohesive government.

1. The Failure of the Articles of Confederation:

   The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were evident. The federal government lacked the power to tax, raise an army, or regulate trade effectively. This led to economic turmoil, interstate disputes, and a general sense of instability.

2. Shays’ Rebellion:

   In 1786-87, a rebellion known as Shays’ Rebellion erupted in Massachusetts. Impoverished farmers and veterans, frustrated by debt and high taxes, rebelled against the state government. This uprising highlighted the urgent need for a stronger central government that could maintain order and address economic issues.

3. The Constitutional Convention:

   In response to these challenges, delegates from 12 of the 13 states convened in Philadelphia in 1787 to draft a new constitution. The Constitutional Convention was a gathering of remarkable individuals, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington, who were deeply committed to creating a more stable and effective government.

“We the People”: A Revolutionary Concept

The choice of the phrase “We the People” in the Constitution’s Preamble was revolutionary in several ways:

1. Popular Sovereignty:

   “We the People” expressed the concept of popular sovereignty, the idea that ultimate authority and legitimacy in government reside with the people themselves. This was a stark departure from the monarchical systems that prevailed in many parts of the world at the time.

2. A Nation, Not Just States:

   The Articles of Confederation had emphasized the sovereignty of individual states, often leading to conflicts and a weak federal government. The Preamble’s language emphasized the creation of a unified nation with a shared purpose.

3. Inclusivity:

   The use of “We” in the phrase conveyed a sense of unity and inclusivity. It reflected the framers’ intention to create a government that represented and served all citizens, not just a select few.

4. A Covenant with the People:

   By invoking “We the People,” the framers essentially made a covenant with the citizens, pledging to establish a government that would fulfill the objectives outlined in the Preamble.

5. A Reflective Document:

   The Constitution, with its Preamble, was intended to be a reflection of the collective will and aspirations of the American people. It was a document that would derive its power from the consent of those it governed.

Enduring Relevance

The enduring relevance of “We the People” in the Constitution’s Preamble is evident in its continued significance in American political and legal discourse. Here are some key ways in which it remains relevant today:

1. Democratic Ideals:

   “We the People” continues to symbolize the core principles of democracy, reminding citizens of their central role in shaping the nation’s direction through elections, participation, and civic engagement.

2. Civil Rights and Liberties:

   The Preamble’s commitment to justice and liberty underpins countless legal battles for civil rights and liberties. It serves as a touchstone for interpreting the Constitution’s guarantees of individual freedoms.

3. National Identity:

   “We the People” helps define and reinforce the idea of a national identity that transcends individual states. It fosters a sense of belonging to a larger whole.

4. Constitutional Interpretation:

   The Preamble is often cited in legal arguments as an important statement of the Constitution’s purpose. It guides judges and policymakers in their efforts to interpret and apply the Constitution’s provisions.

5. Inspiration:

   “We the People” continues to inspire citizens to engage in the democratic process, advocating for change and holding their government accountable.

Challenges and Controversies

While the Constitution’s Preamble and the phrase “We the People” are celebrated, they are not without their challenges and controversies:

1. Inclusivity and Exclusivity:

   Critics argue that the framers’ vision of “We the People” was not fully inclusive,

 as it excluded enslaved individuals, women, and Indigenous peoples from full citizenship and representation. Over time, the nation has grappled with these exclusions and worked towards a more inclusive democracy.

2. Interpretation Disputes:

   There are ongoing debates about the proper interpretation of the Constitution’s Preamble and its implications for contemporary issues. These disputes often center on the balance between individual rights and government authority.

3. Changing Demographics:

   The demographics of the United States have evolved significantly since the Constitution was written. The challenge lies in adapting the principles of “We the People” to an increasingly diverse and complex society.

Conclusion

“We the People” is not merely a historical relic but a living testament to the enduring principles of American democracy. The Constitution’s Preamble, with its bold declaration of popular sovereignty and its aspirational goals, continues to guide the nation’s path. It reminds citizens of their essential role in shaping the country’s destiny and holds the government accountable to the people it serves.

As the United States confronts new challenges and opportunities in the 21st century, the words “We the People” remain a source of inspiration, a call to action, and a symbol of the nation’s ongoing commitment to the ideals of justice, liberty, and the common welfare. In embracing the legacy of “We the People,” Americans continue to forge a more perfect union, mindful of their shared responsibilities and the promise of a brighter future for all.

___________________________________________________________________________

International Outlook vs Interests of American People

The Constitution of the United States is one of the most influential legal documents in human history. It has served as a model for many other countries and has been referenced in countless legal cases around the world. A key phrase in the preamble of the Constitution is the words “We the People,” which asserts that the Constitution is a document created by and for the American people. However, this view of the Constitution has been challenged by an international outlook, which suggests that the Constitution should be seen as a document with global relevance and universal principles. In this article, we will explore the “We the People” view of the Constitution and its relationship with the international outlook.

“We the People” View of the Constitution

The phrase “We the People” in the preamble of the Constitution asserts that the Constitution is a document created by and for the American people. This view of the Constitution is rooted in a belief in American exceptionalism and a sense of national pride. The United States is seen as a unique country with its own set of values and principles, and the Constitution is seen as the embodiment of those values and principles.

The “We the People” view of the Constitution is often associated with national sovereignty and a belief in the primacy of American law over international law. Proponents of this view argue that the Constitution is a document created by the American people, and therefore its principles and values should be the only ones that matter in interpreting its meaning and intent. This view is often used to justify a more limited role for international law in American jurisprudence.

One of the most significant debates surrounding the “We the People” view of the Constitution is whether the Constitution is a “living document” or a document with a fixed meaning. Those who argue that the Constitution is a living document believe that its meaning can change over time as society evolves and new challenges arise. Others argue that the Constitution has a fixed meaning and that its principles and values should be interpreted based on the original intent of its framers.

International Outlook on the Constitution

The international outlook on the Constitution takes a different approach to the document’s relevance and meaning. Rather than seeing the Constitution as a document created by and for the American people, the international outlook sees the Constitution as a document with global relevance and universal principles.

The international outlook on the Constitution is often associated with a belief in universal human rights and a commitment to international law and institutions. Proponents of this view argue that the Constitution’s principles and values are not unique to the United States but are shared by all people around the world. They believe that the Constitution can, and should, serve as a model for other countries in developing their own legal systems and institutions.

One of the most significant debates surrounding the international outlook on the Constitution is the extent to which it should be seen as a “living document” that can evolve over time. Those who argue for a more universal interpretation of the Constitution often view it as a document with principles and values that can be applied in different contexts and in different countries.

Debating the Role of the Constitution

The “We the People” view of the Constitution and the international outlook on the Constitution represent two very different approaches to interpreting the document and its principles and values. While both views have their supporters, the debate between the two is often fraught with tension and disagreement.

Supporters of the “We the People” view of the Constitution often criticize the international outlook for undermining American sovereignty and national identity. They argue that a universal interpretation of the Constitution would lead to a loss of control over the country’s legal system and would dilute its unique values and principles.

Supporters of the international outlook on the Constitution, on the other hand, often criticize the “We the People” view for being narrow and exclusionary. They argue that the Constitution’s values and principles are not unique to the United States and can be applied in other countries to promote human rights and democratic governance.

The role of the Constitution in American jurisprudence and international affairs is likely to continue to be a topic of debate for many years to come. While the “We the People” view of the Constitution and the international outlook on the Constitution represent two very different approaches to interpreting the document and its principles and values, both have the potential to shape the future of American law and global governance. Ultimately, the debate will depend on how Americans envision their country’s place in the world and how they view the role of the Constitution in achieving their goals.

We the People: An Overview

When the U.S. Constitution was drafted in 1787, it began with a preamble that has come to be known as “We the People.” This phrase has become one of the most famous and inspiring passages of the document and has been famously recited on many occasions, including at the inauguration of the President of the United States.

But what exactly does “We the People” mean? Who are these people, and why are they significant to the Constitution? In this article, we will explore the meaning of “We the People” and its importance to the Constitution.

The Original Intent Behind the Phrase

To understand the meaning of “We the People,” it is helpful to take a closer look at the context in which it was written. The phrase comes near the beginning of the Constitution and serves as an introduction to the guiding principles of the new government. The preamble states:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

In other words, the Constitution was written to create a stronger, more unified government that would promote justice, security, and freedom for all Americans. The phrase “We the People” was a way of emphasizing that the power of the government came from the people themselves, rather than from any external source such as a monarch or a deity. The Constitution was designed to be a document of the people, by the people, and for the people.

The Significance of “We the People”

So who exactly are these people? The phrase “We the People” is meant to encompass all citizens of the United States, regardless of their race, gender, religion, or social status. It is a way of saying that the government derives its legitimacy and authority from the people, and that the people have the power to shape and influence the government’s actions.

The phrase also has an important historical context. At the time the Constitution was written, the idea of a government “by the people” was a radical departure from the forms of government that had existed for centuries, where power was held by a small ruling class or a single monarch. The Constitution represented a bold experiment in democracy, and the phrase “We the People” was a way of emphasizing that this experiment was rooted in the collective will of the American people.

The Contested Nature of “We the People”

Despite its inspiring rhetoric, the phrase “We the People” has always been somewhat contested and ambiguous. For example, when the Constitution was written, it only applied to white male landowners. Women, African Americans, Native Americans, and others were excluded from many of the rights and protections that the Constitution enshrined.

Today, this exclusion has been largely rectified through amendments and court rulings, but the phrase “We the People” continues to be contested in other ways. Some argue that the government does not really reflect the will of the people and that wealthy interest groups and corporations hold too much power. Others argue that certain groups, such as undocumented immigrants, do not truly count as part of “We the People.”

Conclusion

Despite its contested nature, the phrase “We the People” remains an important part of the U.S. Constitution and American political discourse. It serves as a reminder that the government derives its power from the people, and that the people have the right and responsibility to shape the direction of that government. The original intent behind the phrase was to create a more unified, just, and free nation, and it remains an inspiring and aspirational ideal for all Americans to strive for.

“We the People”: Unpacking the Core Essence of Constitutional Authority

Introduction

The opening words of the United States Constitution, “We the People,” resonate as a powerful declaration that encapsulates the fundamental principles of democratic governance. These three simple words carry a weighty significance, encapsulating the essence of a government established by and for the citizens it represents. In this exploration, we delve into the profound meaning of the phrase “We the People,” its historical context, its appearances beyond the Constitution, and its enduring impact on American democracy.

The Essence of “We the People”

The phrase “We the People” encapsulates the foundational principle of popular sovereignty, emphasizing that the ultimate source of authority in the United States rests with its citizens. These opening words not only affirm the legitimacy of the Constitution but also establish that the government derives its power from the consent of the governed. The framers intentionally chose this language to underscore that the Constitution’s authority emanates from the collective will and participation of the American people.

Historical Context

The inclusion of “We the People” in the Constitution reflects the framers’ commitment to breaking away from the monarchical rule of Great Britain and embracing self-governance. The phrase crystallizes the shift from a system where rulers held absolute power to one in which the people were empowered to shape their government. This principle was a response to the colonists’ grievances and their desire to create a new nation founded on the ideals of liberty, justice, and equality.

Beyond the Constitution

While “We the People” holds a prominent place in the preamble of the Constitution, it also appears in other contexts, affirming its continued significance. One such instance is the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868. This amendment solidified the concept of citizenship and equal protection under the law for all persons born or naturalized in the United States. In this context, “We the People” expanded its reach to include previously marginalized communities and underscored the nation’s commitment to inclusivity.

Additionally, the phrase reverberates in landmark Supreme Court cases. For instance, in the case of “We the People Foundation v. United States” (2004), the court examined issues related to government transparency and accountability. This case illustrated how “We the People” continues to serve as a reminder of the citizenry’s right to petition the government and hold it accountable.

Enduring Impact

“We the People” has evolved into a symbol that transcends its original context, becoming a rallying cry for civic engagement and democratic participation. It underscores the idea that the Constitution is a living document that requires the active involvement of citizens to uphold its principles. The phrase has inspired generations of Americans to take an active role in shaping their government, participating in elections, and advocating for policy changes that reflect their values.

Moreover, “We the People” has become an educational cornerstone, encouraging citizens to learn about their rights, responsibilities, and the workings of the government. The National Archives in Washington, D.C., displays the Constitution and its preamble, allowing visitors to engage directly with this historic document and the sentiment it embodies.

Conclusion

“We the People” is not just a set of words in the Constitution; it encapsulates the heart of American democracy. This foundational phrase reflects the transformative shift from monarchy to self-governance, emphasizing the authority of citizens in shaping their government. As it extends beyond the Constitution’s preamble, “We the People” continues to empower marginalized communities, remind citizens of their civic duties, and inspire active participation in democratic processes. Its enduring impact ensures that the ideals of the framers live on in the ongoing pursuit of a more perfect union, where government is of, by, and for the people.

What Does We the People Mean?

“We the People” is a phrase that comes from the Preamble of the United States Constitution. In the Preamble of the United States, it talks about what the purpose of the Constitution, and what principles guide it.

Where Does “We The People” Show Up?

“We the People” is in the very first sentence of the United States Constitution. Here is the text where “We the People” is found:

“WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

What Does “We the People” Mean?

While you may think that the phrase “We the People” is talking about all Americans, there is actually much more to the phrase. “We the People” includes all the citizens of the United States of America. The importance of this phrase shows that it was just the framers of the Constitution of the legislators who were given powers to the government. Instead, the government gets all of its powers from all of the Citizens of the United States of America.

Who Does “We the People” Include?

Today, “We the People” includes all citizens of the United States. They can be any race and any gender. In order to be a citizen and be a part of “We the People,” you can be born in the United States or you can receive your citizenship. However, when the Constitution was ratified, some groups of people did not have the same rights as others. For example, women and slaves were not able to vote. Without being able to vote, they would not be able to choose representatives and be involved in lawmaking.

Why is “We the People” Important?

When you read the entire preamble, you can see that it is “We the People” who are giving the government their powers. This is very important because without the people lending that power, the United States Constitution would not have been able to become the guideline for the Republican government we have today.