Laws Lawyers Find Laws Legal Forms State Laws Bills
Home » Legal News » Texas Girl Sues Parents Trying To Force Abortion

Texas Girl Sues Parents Trying To Force Abortion

February 18, 2013 05:53pm  
After being told by her parents she would not be allowed to continue her pregnancy to term, a teenager is suing for the right to have her baby.Both pro-life and pro-choice advocates have expressed dismay over the situation in Texas, in which the 16 year old girl's mother and father allegedly used threats and coercion to attempt to force her to obtain an abortion. A judge has already granted a temporary restraining order to the girl, whose name was not revealed to the public in court documents because she is a minor.The girl, who was nine weeks pregnant when she told her parents about the pregnancy, had been living with her grandmother for several months beforehand. While abortion clinics will not perform an abortion on an unwilling patient, regardless of whether their parents believe they should obtain an abortion, the girl in this case was still frightened.According to her court testimony, her mother and her paternal grandparents actually discussed “slipping” an abortion pill into the girl's food or drink in order to cause a miscarriage. The girl's parents told her that having an abortion was her “only option,” according to allegations made in obtaining the temporary restraining order.Because she refused to agree to an abortion, her parents allegedly kept her out of school and took her car.They also began a campaign of harassment against the father of the girl's unborn child and repeatedly threatened them, according to court documents. According to laws in Texas and many other states, minors who want to obtain abortions have to obtain parental consent except in very limited cases.However, because abortion clinics will not accept patients who are having abortion procedures against their will, there is no specific law on the books in Texas that would prevent this kind of reproductive coercion. The girl's attorneys say that the precedent established in the landmark Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade shows clearly that she should have the right to make her own choice about whether to terminate her pregnancy.The judge's temporary restraining order blocks the girl's parents from doing anything to cause a termination of her pregnancy at least until the conclusion of the court case. Given the girl's gestational age, it is very unlikely that she would be able to legally abort after the conclusion of the court case.Medical abortions (the type induced with abortion pills) are typically only available until week 8 or 9 of pregnancy, and it becomes significantly more difficult and expensive to obtain abortions past the 12 week mark that represents the end of the first trimester. Sources: chron.com, khou.com
Loading...
  • Play
  • Pause
  • Volume:
  • Mute
  • Half
  • Max
  • Texas Girl Sues Parents Trying To Force Abortion

    After being told by her parents she would not be allowed to continue her pregnancy to term, a teenager is suing for the right to have her baby.  Both pro-life and pro-choice advocates have expressed dismay over the situation in Texas, in which the 16 year old girl's mother and father allegedly used threats and coercion to attempt to force her to obtain an abortion.

    A judge has already granted a temporary restraining order to the girl, whose name was not revealed to the public in court documents because she is a minor.  The girl, who was nine weeks pregnant when she told her parents about the pregnancy, had been living with her grandmother for several months beforehand.

    While abortion clinics will not perform an abortion on an unwilling patient, regardless of whether their parents believe they should obtain an abortion, the girl in this case was still frightened.  According to her court testimony, her mother and her paternal grandparents actually discussed “slipping” an abortion pill into the girl's food or drink in order to cause a miscarriage.

    The girl's parents told her that having an abortion was her “only option,” according to allegations made in obtaining the temporary restraining order.  Because she refused to agree to an abortion, her parents allegedly kept her out of school and took her car.  They also began a campaign of harassment against the father of the girl's unborn child and repeatedly threatened them, according to court documents.

    According to laws in Texas and many other states, minors who want to obtain abortions have to obtain parental consent except in very limited cases.  However, because abortion clinics will not accept patients who are having abortion procedures against their will, there is no specific law on the books in Texas that would prevent this kind of reproductive coercion.

    The girl's attorneys say that the precedent established in the landmark Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade shows clearly that she should have the right to make her own choice about whether to terminate her pregnancy.  The judge's temporary restraining order blocks the girl's parents from doing anything to cause a termination of her pregnancy at least until the conclusion of the court case.

    Given the girl's gestational age, it is very unlikely that she would be able to legally abort after the conclusion of the court case.  Medical abortions (the type induced with abortion pills) are typically only available until week 8 or 9 of pregnancy, and it becomes significantly more difficult and expensive to obtain abortions past the 12 week mark that represents the end of the first trimester.

    Sources: chron.com, khou.com

    Comments

    Must Read

    Affirmative Action Explained Affirmative Action Explained
    People who are interested in the question of “What is affirmative action?” should refer specifically to the legislative history of the United States, in which affirmative action was first conceived and implemented as a means of reversing the effects of systemic discrimination in the educational and employment arenas with respect to members of groups deemed to be underprivileged.
    Civil Law Civil Law
    Civil law refers to the general category for legal systems derived or descended from the framework of laws through which the Roman Empire was administered.
    Direct Discrimination vs. Indirect Discrimination Direct Discrimination vs. Indirect Discrimination
    The concept of discrimination as an offense and a meaningful ground for legal action and remedy is understood in the legal system of the United Kingdom as being split into two specific subjects: direct discrimination and indirect discrimination.
    What are Civil Rights? What are Civil Rights?
    Civil rights are a basic category of human rights afforded to and held by all people according to the modern legal and political theory of the last few hundred years.
    Operation Confirm
    Are you sure you want to delete it?
      
    Tips